Effective censorship of a distributed service requires simultaneous enforcement across every jurisdiction hosting nodes. With no head office to coerce, a legal attack requires coordination across multiple independent legal systems — making successful suppression 'very expensive indeed — hopefully beyond even the resources of governments.' Local bans (e.g., country-level) do not affect nodes in other jurisdictions.

Anderson establishes that anonymity and physical redundancy are substitutes: 'Anonymity enables us to reduce diversity.' Tamper-resistant hardware security modules controlling anonymized file servers ensure no identifiable group of people — including sysadmins — can locate or delete a specific file without breaking a quorum of hardware modules distributed across jurisdictions.

§4.5 defense

Using Byzantine-fault-tolerant protocols (specifically Rampart), seven replicas suffice to resist a conspiracy of any two malicious administrators or the accidental destruction of four systems with guaranteed complete recovery. Signing all files with a system key further ensures that a full recovery is possible as long as a single valid copy and an uncompromised public key survive.

§4.6 defense

The Eternity Service's core design stores a file on 100 servers worldwide but retains records of only 10 for auditing, destroying the remaining 90 records. Even if a user is legally compelled to disclose all 10 known server locations and those copies are seized, 90 copies survive at unknown locations and can be retrieved via anonymous broadcast once the user leaves the jurisdiction.

§4.3 defense

Traffic analysis is identified as the primary threat to location secrecy in a distributed anonymous storage system: if an adversary can correlate inter-server communications or link requests to stored file locations, it can target physical seizure. The paper proposes mix-nets (Chaum 1981) for user-facing file delivery and dining-cryptographers ring protocols for inter-server communications, supplemented by traffic padding, so that even traffic analysis yields no actionable location information.

§4.5 detection

The June 2025 Iran shutdown—carried out during the Iran-Israel war beginning ~June 19—did not use BGP route withdrawals as in 2019. Instead, authorities applied service-level restrictions at the national border: DNS poisoning of foreign destinations, protocol whitelisting permitting only pre-approved domestic services, and DPI to block circumvention-tool traffic. Iran's international traffic fell roughly 90% while the country's BGP routes remained advertised, making the shutdown invisible to BGP-based monitoring systems. OONI measurement volume, which totalled 121,333 in June 2025, collapsed to under 200 submissions on June 19-20.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement Executive Summary / §2 dpidns-poisoningport-blockingip-blocking

Chinese users treat full proxy/VPN (Shadowsocks, V2Ray/Clash, commercial VPNs) as the '终极大杀器' (ultimate solution) for bypassing GitHub DNS poisoning, implying that lighter-weight DNS-only fixes fail in some network environments where the censor adds firewall-layer blocking beyond DNS.

2026-anon-6-github-dns §3 使用代理或 VPN dns-poisoningip-blocking

Rule-based proxy tools (Clash, Shadowsocks, V2Ray) are documented as the most reliable solution for accessing GitHub from China, with split-tunneling rules routing only GitHub traffic through the proxy while keeping domestic traffic on the direct path. Git command-line tools require explicit proxy configuration (git config --global http.proxy http://127.0.0.1:7890) to route clone/push operations, as they do not inherit system proxy settings automatically.

2026-anon-github-2026-6-dns §方法二 dns-poisoningip-blocking

The GFW blocks GitHub via DNS poisoning across at least four domains — github.com, assets-cdn.github.com, github.global.ssl.fastly.net, and raw.githubusercontent.com — causing connection timeouts and page-load failures for mainland China users. The block is persistent as of February 2026, affecting both browser access and command-line git operations.

2026-anon-github-2026-6-dns Introduction / §方法一 dns-poisoningip-blocking

Article 19 documents that Iran's National Information Network (NIN / SHOMA) was designed with explicit reference to China's Great Firewall as a model, with institutional mirroring: Iran's Supreme Council of Cyberspace parallels China's Cyberspace Administration of China, and both governments share a "cyber sovereignty" doctrine used to justify domestic content controls and cross-border technology transfer. The report frames Iran's filtering infrastructure as deliberately architected to replicate GFW capabilities, not as an independently developed system.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §2, §3 dpisni-blockingdns-poisoningip-blockingbgp-hijackthrottling

Article 19 documents that Iran combines technical filtering with formal coercion of major foreign platforms (including Telegram, Instagram, and WhatsApp) to comply with content removal orders under threat of full blocking. The report notes that Iran's 2022 Women Life Freedom protests accelerated platform blocking when foreign operators refused compliance, demonstrating that the censorship system operates in two modes: coerce-and-allow for compliant platforms, block for non-compliant ones. Domain fronting via these platforms is therefore subject to sudden revocation if political conditions change.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §6 ip-blockingdns-poisoningthrottling