FINDING · EVALUATION
After crowdsourced (MTurk) enhancement, 88% of stegotexts on average pass a One-Class SVM trained on 150K sentences from Wikipedia, Brown, and Reuters corpora as natural language; pre-enhancement, only 25–58% pass. For calibration, the same classifier correctly rejects 97% of randomly generated sentences as non-natural-language.
From 2016-safaka-matryoshka — Matryoshka: Hiding Secret Communication in Plain Sight · §5 · 2016 · Free and Open Communications on the Internet
Implications
- A human polishing step—even a few minutes—collapses ML detection accuracy from ~65–75% to ~12% false-positive rate; circumvention tools handling text channels should expose a lightweight review/edit interface rather than fully automating stego output.
- Train and test evasion against One-Class SVM with parse-score + POS-tag features, not just entropy/n-gram baselines, as this is the most naturalistic detector evaluated.
Tags
Extracted by claude-sonnet-4-6 — review before relying.