A proof-of-concept Linux prototype using UMIP (open-source MIPv6) with three routers and five commodity machines (2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM) demonstrated correct CoA rotation every 10 seconds. Signaling overhead was reduced to one-third of standard MIPv6 by eliminating return routability messages; per-packet transmission overhead was 24 bytes (IPsec ESP), identical to the baseline secure-channel cost, yielding zero net overhead attributable to the MTD mechanism.

A CAPTCHA-gated registration scheme with sequences of reCAPTCHAs at random intervals and short solve windows limits automated censor deployment. With 5 minutes spent per registration, a human adversary working non-stop for 24 hours can create at most 288 censors; combined with a 12-hour registration reset cycle, this bounds the adversary's censor accumulation rate.

§IV-B defense

For complete blockage (>99%) over 10 hours, the adversary requires a swarming ratio of 12.8, translating to 128,000 censors against a single server with 10,000 CoAs. Scaling to a 10-server, 10-interface deployment forces the adversary to operate 106,700 humans in parallel; with a 5-minute CAPTCHA registration and a 12-hour reset cycle, achieving complete blockage within 10 hours requires 1,067 non-stop human operators in the first two hours.

§IV-A, §IV-B evaluation

A credit-based accounting method dynamically assigns users to larger groups as their trust score accumulates (credit increases by G−1 per unblocked interval), requiring a user's credit to be twice the group's risk before joining. This reduces the total number of CoAs needed while making it costly for censor agents to infiltrate large groups, since they must wait through many clean intervals before the group reaches exploitable size.

§IV-D defense

The MI-MTD framework uses Mobile IPv6 Care-of Addresses (CoAs) rotated among randomized user groups every shuffling interval. With 1,000,000 users, 5,000 censors, and 10,000 CoAs (swarming ratio φ=0.5), per-interval access probability is 60.88%; over one minute with 10-second shuffling intervals, blocking probability drops to approximately 0.358%, meaning users retain ~99.6% chance of access.

§IV-A defense

The June 2025 Iran shutdown—carried out during the Iran-Israel war beginning ~June 19—did not use BGP route withdrawals as in 2019. Instead, authorities applied service-level restrictions at the national border: DNS poisoning of foreign destinations, protocol whitelisting permitting only pre-approved domestic services, and DPI to block circumvention-tool traffic. Iran's international traffic fell roughly 90% while the country's BGP routes remained advertised, making the shutdown invisible to BGP-based monitoring systems. OONI measurement volume, which totalled 121,333 in June 2025, collapsed to under 200 submissions on June 19-20.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement Executive Summary / §2 dpidns-poisoningport-blockingip-blocking

Chinese users treat full proxy/VPN (Shadowsocks, V2Ray/Clash, commercial VPNs) as the '终极大杀器' (ultimate solution) for bypassing GitHub DNS poisoning, implying that lighter-weight DNS-only fixes fail in some network environments where the censor adds firewall-layer blocking beyond DNS.

2026-anon-6-github-dns §3 使用代理或 VPN dns-poisoningip-blocking

Rule-based proxy tools (Clash, Shadowsocks, V2Ray) are documented as the most reliable solution for accessing GitHub from China, with split-tunneling rules routing only GitHub traffic through the proxy while keeping domestic traffic on the direct path. Git command-line tools require explicit proxy configuration (git config --global http.proxy http://127.0.0.1:7890) to route clone/push operations, as they do not inherit system proxy settings automatically.

2026-anon-github-2026-6-dns §方法二 dns-poisoningip-blocking

The GFW blocks GitHub via DNS poisoning across at least four domains — github.com, assets-cdn.github.com, github.global.ssl.fastly.net, and raw.githubusercontent.com — causing connection timeouts and page-load failures for mainland China users. The block is persistent as of February 2026, affecting both browser access and command-line git operations.

2026-anon-github-2026-6-dns Introduction / §方法一 dns-poisoningip-blocking

Article 19 documents that Iran's National Information Network (NIN / SHOMA) was designed with explicit reference to China's Great Firewall as a model, with institutional mirroring: Iran's Supreme Council of Cyberspace parallels China's Cyberspace Administration of China, and both governments share a "cyber sovereignty" doctrine used to justify domestic content controls and cross-border technology transfer. The report frames Iran's filtering infrastructure as deliberately architected to replicate GFW capabilities, not as an independently developed system.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §2, §3 dpisni-blockingdns-poisoningip-blockingbgp-hijackthrottling

Article 19 documents that Iran combines technical filtering with formal coercion of major foreign platforms (including Telegram, Instagram, and WhatsApp) to comply with content removal orders under threat of full blocking. The report notes that Iran's 2022 Women Life Freedom protests accelerated platform blocking when foreign operators refused compliance, demonstrating that the censorship system operates in two modes: coerce-and-allow for compliant platforms, block for non-compliant ones. Domain fronting via these platforms is therefore subject to sudden revocation if political conditions change.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §6 ip-blockingdns-poisoningthrottling