FINDING · EVALUATION
A censor using latency analysis to classify decoy routing sessions achieves a maximum F-score that drops to nearly 0 when the base rate of decoy routing falls below 10^-4 (one in 10,000 connections). Even at higher adoption rates the F-score remains below 0.5 for most overt sites, making reliable detection infeasible without unacceptable false-positive rates on legitimate traffic.
From 2018-bocovich-secure — Secure asymmetry and deployability for decoy routing systems · §4.2 · 2018 · Privacy Enhancing Technologies
Implications
- Keeping decoy routing sessions rare relative to total overt-site traffic (below 1 in 10,000 connections) provides inherent statistical protection against latency-based detection without any protocol changes.
- Avoid overt sites with anomalously low or variable latency (the paper flags google.com TCP RTTs and youtube.com TLS handshake times as outliers) when selecting overt destinations, as these give censors a stronger classification signal.
Tags
Extracted by claude-sonnet-4-6 — review before relying.