Discop with Huffman-tree recursion achieves entropy utilization of 0.92–0.94 (bits embedded ÷ entropy available) and an embedding capacity of 3.48–5.29 bits/token across nucleus-sampling parameters p=0.80–0.98 with GPT-2, matching or exceeding ADG (0.78–0.84 utilization, 3.07–4.89 bits/token) while maintaining exactly zero KL divergence. Per-bit embedding time is 2.17E-03 to 5.52E-03 seconds, comparable to ADG.

Discop's core algorithm is modality-agnostic and deploys unchanged across text generation (GPT-2, DistilGPT-2, Transformer-XL), image completion (Image GPT), and text-to-speech (Tacotron + WaveRNN), requiring only that both parties share the generative model, PRNG, and seed. The same zero-KLD security proof applies across all modalities.

§IV defense

Discop achieves provably perfect steganographic security (DKL(Pc‖Ps) = 0) by constructing multiple 'distribution copies' of a generative model's predicted distribution and using the copy index to encode the secret message. Because all copies share identical token probabilities, the stego distribution is exactly equal to the cover distribution and no steganalyzer can perform better than random guessing.

§III defense

All prior provably-secure steganography methods introduce measurable distribution distortion: ADG achieves Max KLD of 4.54E-02 to 6.76E-02 bits/token, and Meteor with its heuristic sorting reaches Max KLD up to 9.01E+00 bits/token (Table II, GPT-2, p=0.80). These non-zero KL divergences give any statistical steganalyzer a non-negligible distinguishing advantage, violating the security definition even when average divergence appears small.

§V, Table II evaluation

Replacement-based covert channels that substitute genuine media streams with ciphertext (Protozoa replacing WebRTC video, Balboa replacing audio) are immediately detectable when the censor controls or has plaintext access to the protocol gateway — for example, a WebRTC relay that decrypts and validates incoming media. Censors can also systematically suppress these channels by selectively degrading or blocking encrypted traffic for which they have no decryption trapdoor.

§I detection