FINDING · EVALUATION
Across all 7 global data centers (EU, USA, Singapore, Brazil), every data center recorded ECH successes with no observed evidence of regional ECH blocking or interference. ECH-aware client percentages varied by region — EU 75%, North America 63%, Asia 49%, South America 46% — but this was attributed to browser version distribution rather than censorship. The trial spanned 14 geographically distributed PoPs.
From 2025-farrell-ech-trial-report — ECH Trial Report · §6.2, §6.5, Table 4 · 2025 · Wikimedia technical report
Implications
- ECH is not yet being actively blocked at a network level in regions covered by this trial; deployers can enable ECH at public servers without triggering IP-level blocking, unlike what has been observed for Cloudflare ECH in Russia.
- Monitor HTTPS RR (TYPE65) DNS query blocking as a potential censorship vector — the trial did not directly test this vector, and it could degrade ECH without producing TLS-level failures.
Tags
Extracted by claude-sonnet-4-6 — review before relying.