The GFW applies censorship to all Chinese data center egress, not only to residential end-user connections. A VPS with a Chinese IP that attempts to route traffic outside China is blocked by the GFW regardless of whether it belongs to a nominally legitimate commercial service. This nullifies the relay advantage of the proposed 回国VPN strategy.

Exploiting a commercial 回国VPN as a circumvention carrier requires the service to use a blacklist routing policy (tunnel only Chinese IPs) rather than a whitelist policy, and requires reverse-engineering the closed tunnel protocol. The combination of policy opacity and reverse-engineering overhead makes the approach impractical for general deployment even setting aside GFW data-center blocking.

Issue body detection

Community respondents explain that the proposed 回国VPN exploitation strategy fails because the GFW monitors all outbound connections from Chinese data centers regardless of the tunnel mechanism used. The legitimacy of the outer 回国VPN service does not confer immunity to GFW inspection on the outbound path.

Community responses (summarized in abstract) detection

A proposed circumvention technique nests an outbound tunnel inside a legitimate 回国VPN (return-to-China service): the China-IP endpoint of the outer tunnel acts as a relay, with a VPS outside China pushing data back through it in reverse. The theoretical benefit is that 回国VPN services are officially permitted and reportedly not throttled by the GFW.

Issue body defense

回国VPN services are legitimate commercial products designed to give Chinese diaspora enterprises access to Chinese-hosted services, creating tunnels inbound from the open internet to servers inside China. Their legitimacy and preferential GFW treatment are directionally specific — they are sanctioned for inbound-to-China use, not for outbound circumvention.

Original post (OP) and abstract deployment

The June 2025 Iran shutdown—carried out during the Iran-Israel war beginning ~June 19—did not use BGP route withdrawals as in 2019. Instead, authorities applied service-level restrictions at the national border: DNS poisoning of foreign destinations, protocol whitelisting permitting only pre-approved domestic services, and DPI to block circumvention-tool traffic. Iran's international traffic fell roughly 90% while the country's BGP routes remained advertised, making the shutdown invisible to BGP-based monitoring systems. OONI measurement volume, which totalled 121,333 in June 2025, collapsed to under 200 submissions on June 19-20.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement Executive Summary / §2 dpidns-poisoningport-blockingip-blocking

LetsVPN (快连) announced termination of China mainland operations on April 28, 2026, stating the team had attempted adjustments 'almost every hour' for 20 days before concluding the connectivity problem was unsolvable. A follow-up announcement on May 8 declared 'resumption of global standard operations' but explicitly stated it could not guarantee China mainland availability.

2026-anon-2026-27-vpn §3 (快连 / LetsVPN section) ip-blockingdpi

Russia's Roskomnadzor confirmed in February 2026 that it had blocked 469 VPN services used to bypass censorship. Starting December 2025, Russia began blocking the three most commonly used VPN protocols, and from 2025 onward began imposing penalties for promoting VPN services.

2026-anon-2026-27-vpn §5 (Human Rights Watch section) port-blockingdpiip-blocking

In April 2026, Russia nearly completely blocked Telegram, reducing availability without VPN to 5% during the first ten days; Russia's VPN user base was estimated at no less than 40% of the population. Beginning in mid-April, over 20 major Russian websites and platforms (including Gosuslugi, Ozon, Yandex, Sberbank, VK) began restricting access for VPN users, and Russia introduced a whitelist-based service model permitting only state-approved services under certain network restriction states.

2026-anon-2026-27-vpn §4 (俄罗斯 Telegram / OSW section) ip-blockingdpithrottling

LetsVPN's exit is described as part of a broader pattern: a wave of 'airport' (proxy subscription service) outages across multiple providers in April 2026, documented in a companion article titled '2026年四月份各大机场断线详解,' indicating coordinated or systematic GFW blocking affecting the circumvention ecosystem broadly during this period.

2026-anon-letsvpn-vpn §协议写死，特征太明显 (reference to companion article) dpitls-fingerprintip-blocking

The article documents that large-scale 'one-click' commercial VPN providers with static protocol stacks have become effectively non-viable in China, while subscription-based proxy node services using open-source clients (Clash, Shadowrocket) with server-side rapid IP and datacenter switching demonstrate substantially greater resilience to GFW blocking waves.

2026-anon-letsvpn-vpn §为啥傻瓜式一键VPN越来越难活 & §应该怎么选替代方案 dpitls-fingerprintip-blocking