Bridgefy included both sender and receiver long-term identifiers on every message; Albrecht et al. found this unsafe and the deployed security upgrades proved insufficient, leaving Bridgefy unable to provide anonymity. Firechat similarly transmits long-term public user IDs with every message, uniquely identifying accounts to every recipient in the mesh.

In a 600-node simulation on a 25×25 grid representing a city-wide blackout environment, Anix messages reached over 90% of users within 23 simulation steps (~23 hours) even when adversarial Sybil nodes composing 2% of the network refused to forward messages authored by legitimate users. The simulation modeled a 5-day blackout with 120 one-hour steps.

Abstract; §5.2; §6 evaluation

Anix provides two cryptographically distinct identity revocation primitives: soft revocation rotates a user's identity key pair and re-notifies only the retained subset of trusted contacts via encrypted unicast, silently excluding the revoked party; hard revocation broadcasts a signed certificate containing the compromised public key components, instructing all contacts to reject both the revoked identity and any downstream identities produced through subsequent soft revocations.

§4.3 defense

Standard ECDSA signature schemes are vulnerable to public key recovery attacks that allow an adversary to recover the signer's public verification key from any signature, linking all pseudonymous messages authored under different one-time pseudonyms back to a single user identity. This attack succeeds without any side-channel — it operates solely on the message and its ECDSA signature.

§4.2 detection

Rangzen's transitive trust scheme suffers from two structural defects: diminishing trust (each relay hop multiplicatively reduces a message's trust score, degrading trustworthy messages from distant authors) and path dependency (the same message accrues different trust scores depending on which route it traveled, making scores incomparable across recipients). These defects prevent any user from gauging network-wide endorsement of a message.

§2.3 evaluation

During the June 2025 Iran shutdown, circumvention tool performance diverged sharply by transport design. Psiphon's multi-protocol architecture sustained 1.5 million concurrent users—roughly one-third of its normal Iranian base. Lantern's "proxyless" protocol (domain-fronting via CDN, ~40% of Lantern's Iranian traffic) showed moderate success. Tor usage collapsed during the blackout but bridge connections surged and rebounded quickly after lifting. BeePass (serving 500k+ daily users at shutdown onset) used live A/B testing of port/obfuscation-prefix combinations to probe the censors' blocking parameters in real time. The Ceno Browser's P2P network grew from 600 active peers on June 13 to ~8,000 by July 11, indicating that decentralized fallback paths stayed up even during peak blocking.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement §Tool Performance dpithrottling

The June 2025 Iran shutdown—carried out during the Iran-Israel war beginning ~June 19—did not use BGP route withdrawals as in 2019. Instead, authorities applied service-level restrictions at the national border: DNS poisoning of foreign destinations, protocol whitelisting permitting only pre-approved domestic services, and DPI to block circumvention-tool traffic. Iran's international traffic fell roughly 90% while the country's BGP routes remained advertised, making the shutdown invisible to BGP-based monitoring systems. OONI measurement volume, which totalled 121,333 in June 2025, collapsed to under 200 submissions on June 19-20.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement Executive Summary / §2 dpidns-poisoningport-blockingip-blocking

During the June 2025 shutdown, Iranian authorities blocked international One-Time Password (OTP) SMS delivery, preventing new sign-ins to foreign secure-messaging platforms and VPN services. This forced users toward government-approved domestic platforms that lack security and privacy protections. The blockade of OTPs effectively weaponized account-recovery flows as a secondary shutdown layer, disproportionately affecting users who needed to activate new circumvention tools during the crisis.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement §Human Rights Implications port-blockingdpikeyword-filtering

Input blocking in Chinese LLM services (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, Doubao) is overwhelmingly consistent: all four services persistently block the exact same queries across all 5 measurement samples in both Simplified and Traditional Chinese. Output blocking is far less consistent, with only 29 out of 349 output-blocked queries blocked across all 5 samples. Baidu-Chat is exceptional: it performs almost no input blocking but instead relies heavily on post-search and output blocking (78.6% of blocks are output-phase).

2026-ablove-characterizing §VI-B keyword-filteringdpi

A three-stage detection pipeline exploiting the "dual-role" behavioral fingerprint of single-IP circumvention relays achieved 23.2% recall (96/414 ground-truth relays) with a 0.18% false-positive rate against 97,651 benign TLS servers, for an overall accuracy of 99.5%. The ground-truth set covered OpenVPN, WireGuard, and SOCKS relays identified in a 17 TB single-day backbone trace (WIDE Project, April 9, 2025).

2026-almutairi-server §3.4, Table 1 traffic-shapedpiflow-correlation

The paper identifies a fundamental architectural vulnerability in single-IP circumvention designs: a relay must generate new observable flows (via DNS or TLS SNI) to reach end services after receiving client connections, creating a detectable server-and-client behavioral contrast. A relay accessing user-facing domains (news, social media) scores high on a Relay Suspicion Score (w=0.9) versus infrastructure domains (w=0.1). The paper argues this host-level signal is censorship-invariant and cannot be concealed by link obfuscation.

2026-almutairi-server §2.4, §4 traffic-shapedpisni-blocking