The GFW's QUIC censor does not reassemble QUIC client Initial packets that are split across multiple UDP datagrams, nor does it reassemble QUIC CRYPTO frames split within a single datagram. Three practical bypasses follow: (1) send any UDP datagram with a random payload before the QUIC Initial—the GFW uses 60-second UDP flow state and won't inspect a mid-flow packet; (2) fragment the TLS ClientHello SNI across multiple QUIC CRYPTO frames; (3) use an unknown QUIC version number in the first packet (Version Negotiation bypass, payload undecryptable). Chrome independently exploits (2) through its Chaos Protection feature (since 2021) and post-quantum Kyber key-agreement (since v124, Sep 2024), whose larger key sizes force fragmentation across UDP datagrams. As of January 2025, the GFW also does not block ECH-containing QUIC payloads unless the outer (cleartext) SNI is on the blocklist.

The computational cost of decrypting QUIC Initial packets limits the GFW's throughput: blocking effectiveness drops measurably as cross-border QUIC traffic increases and exhibits a diurnal pattern, falling during China's peak traffic hours. In a controlled experiment, sending QUIC Initial packets at 100–1500 kpps (TTL-limited so they reach the GFW but not end-hosts) caused GFW censorship effectiveness to decrease monotonically with sending rate, while equal-rate random-payload UDP traffic produced no such degradation—confirming the bottleneck is QUIC decryption, not raw bandwidth. A related availability attack using IP-spoofed QUIC Initials from one machine can cause the GFW to drop all UDP traffic between arbitrary Chinese hosts and any foreign endpoint for the 180-second residual window.

§3.4 / §5 detection

Since April 7, 2024, the GFW decrypts every QUIC client Initial packet at China's national border and blocks connections whose TLS ClientHello SNI matches a QUIC-specific blocklist. Blocking takes the form of dropping all subsequent UDP packets sharing the same (src-IP, dst-IP, dst-port) 3-tuple for 180 seconds—with no RST injection. The GFW applies a source-port heuristic: packets with src-port ≤ dst-port are not inspected, capturing >92% of real QUIC client Initials while processing only ~30% of all UDP traffic. The QUIC blocklist contains 58,207 unique FQDNs (Tranco, Oct 2024– Jan 2025), approximately 60% of the DNS blocklist in size; 33% of blocked FQDNs do not actually support QUIC, suggesting the list was derived from an existing domain-name blocklist rather than live QUIC service discovery.

§3 / §3.1 / §3.3 / §4 detection

QUICstep successfully circumvents the GFW's QUIC SNI censorship (active since April 2024) in live testing. Using an Alibaba VM in mainland China as client and an AWS instance in North Virginia as server, a native QUIC client was blocked after several fetches of youtube.com SNI, while QUICstep consistently succeeded across 50 consecutive fetches. 7 tiktokcdn.com subdomains that were QUIC-SNI blocked were also reliably accessible via QUICstep. The approach routes only QUIC long-header (handshake) packets through a WireGuard tunnel; all subsequent short-header (data) packets travel the native path.

2026-lee-quicstep §4.3.2, §3.2.3 http3-quic-blocksni-blockingdpi

During the June 2025 blackout, virtually all UDP-based protocols were blocked across major Iranian networks — WireGuard, AmneziaWG, QUIC, WebRTC, and OpenVPN — with the sole deliberate exception of UDP port 53 (DNS), preserved to avoid cascading failures in internal infrastructure.

2025-piotrowska-nym-iran-blackout Protocol-level blocking port-blockingdpihttp3-quic-block

Russia's TSPU ("Средства противодействия угрозам") system is deployed inline at individual ISP edges rather than at centralized internet exchange points, producing substantial per-ISP heterogeneity: some providers apply layer-7 SNI/Host filtering while others rely primarily on IP-prefix blocklists, and QUIC/HTTP3 is blocked at several major providers. Rollout timing and enforcement depth vary measurably across autonomous systems, meaning a single "Russia passes/fails" test fixture systematically underestimates blocking coverage.

2024-xue-tspu-russia §4–§5 sni-blockingdpihttp3-quic-blockip-blocking

During the June 2025 Iran shutdown, circumvention tool performance diverged sharply by transport design. Psiphon's multi-protocol architecture sustained 1.5 million concurrent users—roughly one-third of its normal Iranian base. Lantern's "proxyless" protocol (domain-fronting via CDN, ~40% of Lantern's Iranian traffic) showed moderate success. Tor usage collapsed during the blackout but bridge connections surged and rebounded quickly after lifting. BeePass (serving 500k+ daily users at shutdown onset) used live A/B testing of port/obfuscation-prefix combinations to probe the censors' blocking parameters in real time. The Ceno Browser's P2P network grew from 600 active peers on June 13 to ~8,000 by July 11, indicating that decentralized fallback paths stayed up even during peak blocking.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement §Tool Performance dpithrottling

The June 2025 Iran shutdown—carried out during the Iran-Israel war beginning ~June 19—did not use BGP route withdrawals as in 2019. Instead, authorities applied service-level restrictions at the national border: DNS poisoning of foreign destinations, protocol whitelisting permitting only pre-approved domestic services, and DPI to block circumvention-tool traffic. Iran's international traffic fell roughly 90% while the country's BGP routes remained advertised, making the shutdown invisible to BGP-based monitoring systems. OONI measurement volume, which totalled 121,333 in June 2025, collapsed to under 200 submissions on June 19-20.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement Executive Summary / §2 dpidns-poisoningport-blockingip-blocking

During the June 2025 shutdown, Iranian authorities blocked international One-Time Password (OTP) SMS delivery, preventing new sign-ins to foreign secure-messaging platforms and VPN services. This forced users toward government-approved domestic platforms that lack security and privacy protections. The blockade of OTPs effectively weaponized account-recovery flows as a secondary shutdown layer, disproportionately affecting users who needed to activate new circumvention tools during the crisis.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement §Human Rights Implications port-blockingdpikeyword-filtering