Beginning November 1st, 2025, Myanmar users reported severely asymmetric internet speeds: download speeds were near-unusable while upload speeds remained at normal maximum capacity, a pattern inconsistent with submarine cable faults which typically degrade both directions.

Community technical analysis of the November 2025 Myanmar disruption concluded the observed symptom cluster — unidirectional throttling, rapid VPN IP blocking, and selective service allowlisting — is inconsistent with submarine cable faults and instead indicates deployment of new national-level traffic filtering infrastructure, consistent with GFW-derived Geedge filtering technology previously documented in Myanmar.

Issue body evaluation

A freshly provisioned VPN server in Myanmar was functional for approximately 5 hours before its IP address was completely blocked across all connection methods, indicating the Myanmar filtering infrastructure performs rapid active detection and IP blacklisting of new proxy endpoints.

Issue body detection

During peak disruption periods in Myanmar (post November 1st, 2025), users observed a 'walled garden' effect where the entire internet dropped except for Google and YouTube, which remained selectively accessible — consistent with allowlist-based national firewall policy rather than infrastructure failure.

Issue body deployment

During the June 2025 Iran shutdown, circumvention tool performance diverged sharply by transport design. Psiphon's multi-protocol architecture sustained 1.5 million concurrent users—roughly one-third of its normal Iranian base. Lantern's "proxyless" protocol (domain-fronting via CDN, ~40% of Lantern's Iranian traffic) showed moderate success. Tor usage collapsed during the blackout but bridge connections surged and rebounded quickly after lifting. BeePass (serving 500k+ daily users at shutdown onset) used live A/B testing of port/obfuscation-prefix combinations to probe the censors' blocking parameters in real time. The Ceno Browser's P2P network grew from 600 active peers on June 13 to ~8,000 by July 11, indicating that decentralized fallback paths stayed up even during peak blocking.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement §Tool Performance dpithrottling

In April 2026, Russia nearly completely blocked Telegram, reducing availability without VPN to 5% during the first ten days; Russia's VPN user base was estimated at no less than 40% of the population. Beginning in mid-April, over 20 major Russian websites and platforms (including Gosuslugi, Ozon, Yandex, Sberbank, VK) began restricting access for VPN users, and Russia introduced a whitelist-based service model permitting only state-approved services under certain network restriction states.

2026-anon-2026-27-vpn §4 (俄罗斯 Telegram / OSW section) ip-blockingdpithrottling

After the shutdown lifted (Scan 3), DNS-over-UDP degraded severely — 89.18% of the 9,000 queried domains were affected — but the paper attributes this to general UDP transport instability rather than domain-specific censorship, corroborated by GitHub user reports of ongoing UDP issues. TCP-based protocols (HTTP, TLS) returned to pre-shutdown censorship levels (~15%) in Scan 3, confirming the post-shutdown persistence effect was UDP-specific and not a broadening of the blocklist.

2026-anon-insights-into-iranian §2.2.4, Table 1 throttlinghttp3-quic-block

Iran's June 2025 shutdown was enforced using fine-grained, service-level techniques rather than BGP withdrawals or a single 'big switch' event: individual protocols were selectively blocked before and after the 7-day full blackout (June 18–25), with the total preparation and recovery periods each lasting roughly 4–5 days. Cloudflare Radar showed HTTP traffic reaching near-zero by June 18 but partial recovery already on June 21, while the authors' vantage point (AS57497) remained unreachable until June 25, confirming heterogeneous recovery across Iranian networks.

2026-anon-insights-into-iranian §2, §3 dpihttp3-quic-blockthrottling

Article 19 documents that Iran's National Information Network (NIN / SHOMA) was designed with explicit reference to China's Great Firewall as a model, with institutional mirroring: Iran's Supreme Council of Cyberspace parallels China's Cyberspace Administration of China, and both governments share a "cyber sovereignty" doctrine used to justify domestic content controls and cross-border technology transfer. The report frames Iran's filtering infrastructure as deliberately architected to replicate GFW capabilities, not as an independently developed system.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §2, §3 dpisni-blockingdns-poisoningip-blockingbgp-hijackthrottling

Article 19 documents that Iran combines technical filtering with formal coercion of major foreign platforms (including Telegram, Instagram, and WhatsApp) to comply with content removal orders under threat of full blocking. The report notes that Iran's 2022 Women Life Freedom protests accelerated platform blocking when foreign operators refused compliance, demonstrating that the censorship system operates in two modes: coerce-and-allow for compliant platforms, block for non-compliant ones. Domain fronting via these platforms is therefore subject to sudden revocation if political conditions change.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §6 ip-blockingdns-poisoningthrottling